Watch the full Daily Beltway report
DSA-Linked New Hampshire Candidate Karishma Manzur Refuses to Answer Socialist or Capitalist Question
Karishma Manzur, a Democratic candidate running for U.S. Senate in New Hampshire and a documented member of the Democratic Socialists of America, refused to answer a direct question about her economic ideology during an NBC interview that is now drawing scrutiny from voters and conservative observers.
When asked point-blank whether she considers herself a socialist or a capitalist, Manzur responded, “I’m a scientist!” The NBC reporter pressed her on the deflection, noting that voters deserve clarity on where candidates stand. Manzur doubled down, claiming that “it’s only the media that are asking the questions,” to which the interviewer replied, “Well that is our job.”
Karishma Manzur refuses to tell voters her positions.
NBC: Do you consider yourself a socialist or a capitalist?
MANZUR: “I’m a scientist!”
NBC: "You won't answer a specific yes or no?"
MANZUR: "It's only the media that are asking the questions"
NBC: "Well that is our job." pic.twitter.com/xSkk6sGWKg
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 8, 2026
The exchange reveals a calculated evasion. Manzur is running on economic positions that align with DSA platform priorities, including demands for livable wages and expanded government intervention in the economy. Yet when given the opportunity to label her ideology for New Hampshire voters, she hid behind her professional credentials.
This is not a minor question. The DSA openly advocates for the abolition of capitalism and the implementation of democratic socialism. Membership signals a commitment to that vision. Voters have a right to know if a candidate seeking federal office supports dismantling the economic system that built the American republic.
Manzur’s response strategy is familiar. Candidates with ties to socialist organizations frequently avoid the label when speaking to general audiences, preferring euphemisms like “working families,” “economic justice,” or in this case, “I’m a scientist.” The tactic allows them to campaign on socialist policies while dodging the political cost of owning the ideology.
During the interview, Manzur claimed she is focused on conversations with voters about wages and described herself as “a regular American trying to improve people’s lives right here in New Hampshire.” She added that the country is wealthy and that “anyone who works” should be supported, language that echoes socialist talking points about wealth redistribution.
But regular Americans are not typically members of an organization that calls for the end of private enterprise. The DSA’s platform explicitly rejects the profit motive and seeks to replace market competition with state control of production. Manzur’s membership is public. Her refusal to defend or even acknowledge that position in a press interview raises the question: what else is she unwilling to tell voters?
The NBC interviewer pointed out that when candidates put themselves on the ballot, voters expect transparency on fundamental issues like economic philosophy. Manzur’s dismissal of the question as a media obsession ignores the reality that New Hampshire voters have repeatedly shown interest in knowing where candidates stand on capitalism versus socialism, especially in a political environment where the DSA has gained influence within the Democratic Party.
Manzur is challenging incumbent Democrat Chris Pappas in the primary. Her campaign has emphasized wage issues and criticism of corporate influence, both common DSA themes. Yet she has declined to commit to supporting Pappas if she loses, telling reporters that only a “real Democrat” will earn her vote. The statement suggests she views establishment Democrats as insufficiently left, a stance consistent with DSA ideology.
The pattern is clear. Socialist-aligned candidates seek office by campaigning on policies that require massive government expansion and economic restructuring, but they avoid stating their ideology outright when pressed by journalists. The strategy depends on voters not connecting the dots between DSA membership, policy platforms, and the ultimate goal of replacing capitalism.
New Hampshire voters deserve better. If Manzur believes socialism is the answer, she should defend it openly. If she does not, she should explain why she maintains membership in an organization dedicated to that cause. Hiding behind professional titles and accusing the press of asking the wrong questions is not transparency. It is evasion.
Voters in the Granite State have a long tradition of demanding accountability from candidates. Karishma Manzur has now provided a clear example of a candidate unwilling to give it. The question remains whether primary voters will accept a Senate candidate who refuses to explain the economic system she supports.